VeraLearn with5–8 min · EN

← Vera · Clara · Lucia

How to use this function

Composizione negoziata: from evidence to the final report

Execute one fictional case, separate company advisor and independent expert, and deliver a negative-outcome draft with residual responsibilities.

The explanation and a short practice take about 5–8 minutes. Processing and your questions can extend the session.

Start this course

Codex

  1. Open Codex on your computer with Vera installed and select @Vera in a chat.
  2. Copy the request below, paste it into the chat and send it.
  3. Turn on Codex voice in this chat. The assistant will guide you to open the second working chat in another window: listen and ask questions here, and watch the work and results there.

The fictional lesson files are already included in the plugin. You can also take the lesson in writing. This button copies the request; the lesson starts when you send it in Codex.

Start in Claude Cowork

Open Cowork with Vera installed and a connected folder for the lesson. Copy and send this request: the lesson takes place in writing in one conversation.

Officina Arco CNC is entirely fictional and Italian. At 31 October 2026: loan EUR 120,000, available cash EUR 50,000, restricted deposit EUR 10,000, trade payables EUR 80,000. Assumed receipt EUR 100,000 on 15 November; payment EUR 80,000 on 30 November. Aging, collectability confirmation, orders, appointment and filing receipts are absent. These selected positions are incomplete.

An extended local course across several sessions: advisor demonstration, guided change and independent expert exercise in a separate engagement. Five to eight minutes applies to one explained segment; computation, research, review and practice take additional time. No qualification or automatic eligibility assessment.

Read the case, balances.csv and treasury-demo tables. Empty tables mean no supplied evidence, not no real activity. treasury-practice and treasury-independent accompany the update and independent exercise. The research brief contains a generic public question and URLs to verify, not current law or an approved answer.

Vera, I advise fictional Officina Arco CNC. Read the evidence, separate facts, assumptions and gaps, execute the existing financial and treasury workflows and draft an evidence-conditioned proposal. Guide my exact-version review. Keep the tutorial local without external sends or simulated professional acceptance.
  1. Intake: create the local tutorial case and advisor engagement, import exact sources and record scope, date, currency, urgent events and gaps. Ask only questions that change the work. An absent appointment does not block training and must not be called verified. Open the first note and assign evidence requests.
  2. Analysis: read the current financial and treasury skills. Review the exercise definition of net debt: loan less available cash, excluding restricted deposit and trade payables. Execute net_debt and the supplied treasury tables, complete those runs and bind declared results to a successor CNC run. Check values, evidence and coverage; balances do not prove collectability and the forecast is not the ministerial test.
  3. Research: use quesito-legale-fiscale with the public brief. Explicitly choose ordinary research or an available Deep Research route under the skill, without an automatic hosted handoff. Follow planner and review; inspect applicable primary sources, save contract, answer, sources and limits, and bind the actual deliverable. URLs, snippets and structurally valid records do not prove legal currency or correctness. Failed access remains an open question. No tutorial facts in queries.
  4. Draft and review: write chronology, evidence, assumptions, analysis, conditional proposal and questions. Open the exact draft and ask the learner what to correct. Record only their actual decision: local attribution does not verify identity or approve a handoff. Do not call cnc-review or manufacture receipts. Show the actual model-data report.
  5. Guided change: import the update and practice tables in the same engagement, retain stable IDs and earlier versions. Check stale descendants and wider semantic impact. Recompute treasury, bind the new output and rewrite proposal and report: delayed receipt and creditor refusal, with no documented agreement. Earlier decisions do not apply to the new draft.
  6. Handoff: open the advisor report with no_agreement, bases, limits, missing acts/receipts, residual task owners and dates to verify. Keep draft_handoff: completing a run neither signs, files nor closes the procedure. Next perform the independent expert exercise in a separate engagement using only selected documents: neutral questions, unverified independence/appointment, the expert’s own report and distinct responsibilities.
  1. Intake note and evidence-gap requests with sources and owners.
  2. Executed financial pack, initial and revised forecasts, research answer and review or explicit gap.
  3. Immutable case revisions, role-specific final report, negative handoff and residual tasks.
  4. Readable model-data report, artifact declaration and resumable history.

Trace each figure from CSV to output to report. Separate net debt, bank balance and minimum cash. Check exact versions, bases, role and stale state before deciding. Economic judgment, independence, applicable law, signature and obligations remain professional responsibilities; do not invent receipts or a positive outcome.

  1. What is missing and what work can continue? Is restricted cash available?
  2. Which result actually ran and which task is only proposed?
  3. Which dependencies and decisions need review after the delay?
  4. How do the two reports differ and who owns residual tasks?

These pauses help you learn how to use the function. They are not a technical detail quiz.

First, guided, import update-en.md: receipt moves to 15 January 2027 and the creditor refuses. Preserve the first forecast and draft the negative report. Then independently open exercise-en.md in a separate expert engagement: receipt moves to 15 February, beyond the horizon, with no agreement. Use treasury-independent, deliver a neutral draft, demonstrate source links and resume in a fresh session. Do not automatically copy the advisor’s private case.

You can explain source coverage and limits, demonstrate recalculation and revisions, distinguish the engagements and explain a negative outcome with outstanding decisions and work. Actual practice and your explanation are required; automated tests do not certify learning.

For real work select fresh documents and a professional destination separate from training, confirm role and mandate and follow the current contract. What data reaches the model: the selected runtime may read imported sources, financial tables, forecasts, notes, dependencies, drafts, decisions and discussed public sources. Local helpers do not send these files to Mparanza; local storage is not offline inference or anonymization. The report records actual use, not every model read. Optional hosted review sends opaque identifiers, digest, decision, account and time, and is excluded from this tutorial. No feedback sends, filing or communications to parties.